Lab May 12, 2026
In This Issue
Are You Paying for the Wrong AI?
We Stopped Making Slides. This Makes Them for Us.
Fathom Is Paying People to Leave Fireflies
Everything else in AIOther tools

Good Morning Thorium Valley, welcome back to The Lab.

Today we're looking at whether the two biggest AI chatbots are actually worth the same $20, or if you've been paying for the wrong one this whole time.

We're also testing a presentation tool that claims it can turn a 3-hour slide deck into a 40-minute job.

And we're talking about a meeting notes app so confident it's better than the competition that it's literally paying people to switch.

Quickly before we dive in — When you find an AI tool you actually like, do you tell anyone about it?

Are you paying for the wrong AI?

ASSISTANT

Are you paying for the wrong AI?

If you signed up for ChatGPT Plus a year ago and never looked back, you might be overpaying for the wrong thing. Google's Gemini Pro has quietly caught up — and depending on what you actually use AI for, it might already be better.

When ZDNET ran a head-to-head, Gemini edged ahead on writing quality and Google integration while ChatGPT only took agentic AI. When Tom's Guide tested 10 prompts, ChatGPT swept 10-0 — but even they admitted Gemini's answers were technically accurate. The two tools have quietly specialized, and most people are paying $20 a month without knowing which one they actually need.

Here's how they break down:

+ Research and deep dives: Gemini Pro gives you 20 Deep Research runs per day. ChatGPT Plus caps you at 25 per month. If you use AI to synthesize sources or generate reports, that gap alone could justify switching.

+ Google ecosystem: If you live in Google Workspace, Gemini fits into your workflow in a way ChatGPT can't. It pulls from Gmail, Drive, and Maps inside the same conversation. Google's NotebookLM can build slide decks and infographics from uploaded sources without leaving the interface. Once you start using it, going back feels limiting.

+ Writing and creative work: ChatGPT still writes like a human. Tom's Guide found its answers were fun and relatable, and for drafting, brainstorming, and conversational back-and-forth, it has a tone Gemini hasn't matched. It also leads on agentic features — its built-in Agent Mode can navigate websites and complete purchases without switching apps.

Worth noting: if you want the best pure writing assistant at this price point, Claude Pro is still the one to beat. But for this matchup, the answer depends entirely on your workflow.

The Verdict

If you spend most of your AI time researching, fact-checking, or working inside Google apps, switch to Gemini Pro. If you spend it writing, brainstorming, or need an AI that can browse the web and take actions for you, stay with ChatGPT Plus. Both cost the same $20. The wrong choice is the one you picked a year ago and never revisited.

Try Gemini Pro →

Try ChatGPT Plus →

Try the alternative: Claude Pro →

We stopped making slides. This makes them for us.

DESIGN

We stopped making slides. This makes them for us.

Gamma is an AI presentation tool that turns a prompt into a full slide deck with real structure and decent design. You describe what you want, it builds the whole thing, and you edit from there instead of starting from a blank screen. It's free to start, $9/month for Plus, and $18/month for Pro.

The reason it's worth talking about is a Reddit user who tested four AI presentation workflows every day for three months on real work decks — client proposals, project kickoffs, quarterly reviews. They tried ChatGPT for outlines, Copilot in PowerPoint, Canva's AI features, and Gamma. Gamma won and it wasn't close. Copilot felt generic and needed so much fixing it barely saved time. Canva felt optimized for Instagram, not a client meeting. ChatGPT saved maybe 20% because you still do all the visual work yourself.

Gamma took their deck creation from 2–3 hours down to about 40 minutes. That tracks with independent timing data showing the same 12-slide pitch deck took 4 hours 32 minutes in PowerPoint and 28 minutes in Gamma — and the vast majority of that PowerPoint time wasn't content thinking, it was layout, image sourcing, alignment, and font matching. Production work that has nothing to do with your ideas.

The tool has real limits though, and they're consistent across every user account we found:

+ Data visualization is still manual. None of these AI tools handle custom charts well.

+ Brand consistency requires hand-tweaking. Gamma defaults to its own styles, not yours.

+ Complex layouts fall apart fast. Anything beyond standard text-and-image slides breaks down.

The biggest catch is export. Gamma builds web-native card decks, not traditional slides — they look great as shareable links, but the moment someone opens the .pptx in PowerPoint, things break. A direct competitor found that exported slides came out square instead of 16:9, with text shifted and layouts broken.

The Verdict

If you make multiple decks a week and your presentations stay as shared links or PDFs, Gamma is genuinely great — start with the free tier because it's surprisingly capable. If every deck you make ends up in someone else's PowerPoint, you're going to spend some of that saved time on cleanup.

Try Gamma →

Try the alternative: Canva →

Try the alternative: Google Slides + NotebookLM →

Fathom is paying people to leave Fireflies

PRODUCTIVITY

Fathom is paying people to leave Fireflies

Fathom is so threatened by Fireflies.ai that it's offering Fireflies customers free Fathom Business for the remainder of their contract if they switch. That's a company willing to eat revenue to stop a competitor — which tells you more about Fireflies than any feature table ever could.

Fireflies has 20 million users across 500,000 companies, hit a billion-dollar valuation on just $19 million in funding, and did it with zero paid marketing. The company is actually profitable, which means the $10/seat/month Pro price probably isn't going anywhere. Fathom charges $19 for roughly the same job.

Where Fireflies genuinely pulls ahead:

+ Language support: It transcribes in 100+ languages. Otter supports five. If your team works across borders, Fireflies is the only real option.

+ Integrations: It connects to over 9,000 apps through Zapier and pushes notes into HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack, and Notion without much configuration.

But the $10 sticker price comes with fine print. Fireflies gates AI features behind credits that run out faster than you'd expect — Pro gets 20 per workspace per month, and heavy users will end up paying for extras at roughly $0.10 each. And Fathom's own comparison page features user reviews that are brutal toward Fireflies on usability and output quality. Those are sourced from Fathom's site, so take them accordingly, but the pattern shows up independently too.

The other issue nobody mentions upfront: the meeting bot. IT admins on Reddit have described Fireflies' bot as spreading "like viruses" through calendars, and Google Meet has started flagging it as a security risk depending on your org's settings. If your clients get uncomfortable with a bot named Fred joining their calls, that matters.

The Verdict

Fireflies is the best value in meeting transcription for multilingual teams that need notes flowing into a CRM without manual work. If you're English-only and value simplicity, Fathom does the core job better and Otter is cheaper for basic transcription. The price is real — just watch the credits.

Try Fireflies →

Try the alternative: Fathom →

Try the alternative: Otter →

Everything Else in AI

EVERYTHING ELSE IN AI

What else happened today?

+ Cloudflare fired 1,100 people after its internal AI usage surged 600% in three months — CEO said support roles "are not going to be the roles that drive companies going forward"

+ A federal judge ruled DOGE's use of ChatGPT to cancel $100M in grants was unconstitutional — a staffer admitted he let the chatbot decide which humanities projects to kill without defining what "DEI" even meant

+ A Palo Alto sophomore is suing his high school after an AI detection tool flagged his essay on The Crucible — the school's assistant principal retyped his handwritten rewrite and ran it through Turnitin without telling his parents

+ The EU delayed its toughest AI rules by over a year but added a ban on AI "nudifier" apps that generate nonconsensual explicit images

+ A critical vulnerability called "Bleeding Llama" lets anyone steal prompts, API keys, and conversation history from 300,000 Ollama servers running local AI — no password needed

+ Hugging Face and ClawHub have been flooded with hundreds of malicious AI models that steal credentials and hijack agents for crypto mining — 36% of all AI agent skills now contain security flaws

+ Only 12% of Americans trust AI leaders even though usage nearly doubled — 60% of AI companies are now among the most distrusted brands in the country

+ DeepL cut 21% of its staff and the CEO's memo hit every Silicon Valley buzzword: "AI-native," "founder mode," fewer layers, smaller teams — it's becoming the official layoff playbook

Other Tools

OTHER TOOLS

What our editors are paying attention to today

+ Wispr Flow (sponsored): The new viral voice-to-text AI for iPhone and Mac that actually understands what you're saying every time

+ Superpower (sponsored): The health app that tests your blood and uses AI to tell you what's actually going on with your body before your doctor does

+ Cursor Cloud Agent: Cursor's AI coding tool now lets you hand off long tasks — like rewriting an entire module or generating tests — to a background agent that works in the cloud while you keep coding in your editor

+ Octonous: Mozilla's new automation tool connects your Gmail, Slack, Google Sheets, and dozens of other apps, then lets you describe a workflow in plain English — like "monitor Slack for project updates, log them in a spreadsheet, and email me a summary" — and it builds and runs the whole thing for you

+ Sanity Canvas: The headless CMS now lets you write freely in a doc-like editor, then use AI to automatically label and sort your content into structured fields — so your writing flows into your website's design without copy-pasting between tools

+ Vercel AI SDK: The open-source toolkit that powers AI features in thousands of apps just added a simpler way to give AI instructions, better token tracking across multi-step tasks, and support for ElevenLabs and new model providers — making it easier for developers to wire AI into anything they're building

+ UPDF 2.5: The cross-platform PDF editor added AI agents that can summarize long documents, search by meaning instead of keywords, auto-organize messy pages, and let you edit PDFs by just telling it what to change in plain English

That's the Lab for this week. If a tool in here saved you time or wasted it, tell us — reply directly.

Written by Jason Chen, Advait Prakash, Andrew Hales, and the Thorium Valley crew.

That's all for today's Lab. See you next time.

Keep reading